Soviet Chernobyl vs American Three Mile Island: Information Space as a Factor in Social Crisis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2524-0757.2025.19Keywords:
NPP, Chernobyl, Three Mile Island, information space, information policy, media coverage, crisis communication, psychological aspectsAbstract
The article is devoted to the study of the features of communication and information policy during the periods of the two most famous nuclear accidents of the 20th century: at the Three Mile Island NPP in the USA (1979) and at the Chernobyl NPP in the USSR (1986). The author studies the communicative, media and psychological aspects that determined the information policy of both countries during the crisis period. The scientific novelty lies in the fact that these aspects are considered in connection for the first time. The main attention is paid to comparing the level of openness of information and the methods of its presentation in the conditions of two different political systems – democratic and totalitarian. In the USA, the Three Mile Island accident was accompanied by problems in coordinating messages, which caused some confusion in informing the public. At the same time, the American media had the opportunity to promptly cover the events, which contributed to the rapid formation of public discourse. In the USSR, information about the Chernobyl disaster was subject to strict state control: in the early stages, the authorities resorted to silence, and later to distortion of facts, which significantly influenced public opinion both in the country and abroad. The study also examines the role of the psychological factor in the perception of accidents through the prism of the information space. In the USA, the inconsistency of official messages led to an increase in distrust of the government, but the open information space allowed society to quickly adapt to reality. In contrast, in the USSR, information isolation contributed to the spread of rumors and panic, which subsequently led to an increase in social tension and a crisis of trust in the authorities. The author concludes that the nature of the provision of information directly influenced the level of public anxiety, the behavioral reactions of the population, and the political consequences of the disasters. The experience of the two accidents became an important lesson for the further development of crisis communication, in particular in the field of nuclear energy. The methodological toolkit for revealing the topic is based on a comprehensive approach that combines comparative analysis, media content analysis, discourse analysis, and the case study method.
Downloads
References
Arndt, M. (2012). Chernobyl. Posledstviia avarii na atomnom reaktore dlia Federativnoi Respubliki Germanii i Germanskoi Demokraticheskoi Respubliki [Chernobyl. Consequences of the reactor accident for the Federal Republic of Germany and the German Democratic Republic]. (I. Levit, Trans.). Erfurt: Thüringer Zentrum für Politische Bildung [in Russian].
Baranovska, N. (2011). Chornobylska trahediia. Narysy z istorii [The Chernobyl Tragedy. Essays on History]. Kyiv: IIU NANU [in Ukrainian].
Barkhudarov, R. M. (2009). Chernobyl: razmyshleniya o nekotorykh urokakh avarii [Chernobyl: Reflections on some lessons of the accident]. Radiatsionnaia zashchita: kak eto bylo. [Radiation Protection: How it was]. (Is. 2). Moscow: IBRAE RAN [in Russian].
Cutter, S., & Barnes, K. (1982). Evacuation behavior and Three Mile Island. Disasters, 6(2), 116–124 [in English]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.1982.tb00765.x
Drokonova, O. N. (2015). Chernobyl: Kognitivnaia istoriia sotvoreniia bedy (1970–1986 gg.) [Chernobyl: A cognitive history of disaster creation (1970–1986)]. Tyumen: TyumGNGU [in Russian].
Fabrikant, J. L. (1983). The effects of the accident at Three Mile Island on the mental health and behavioral responses of the general population and nuclear workers. Health Physics, (45), 579–586 [in English].
Flynn, С. B., & Chalmers, J. A. (prep.). (1980). The Social and Economic Effects of the Accident at Three Mile Island. Findings to Date. Washington, D.C.: Division of Safeguards, Fuel Cycle and Environmental Research, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission [in English].
Friedman, S. (1981). Blueprint for Breakdown: Three Mile Island and the Media before the Accident. Journal of Communication, 31(2), 116–128 [in English]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1981.tb01235.x
Friedman, S. (2011). Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima: An analysis of traditional and new media coverage of nuclear accidents and radiation. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 67(5), 55–65 [in English]. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096340211421587
Gilinsky, V. (2009, March 23). Behind the Scenes of Three Mile Island. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientis [in English]. https://thebulletin.org/2009/03/behind-the-scenes-of-three-mile-island-2/
Higginbotham, A. (2020). Chernobyl. Istoriia katastrofy [Chernobyl: History of the disaster] (A. Bugaisky, Trans.; L. Sergeev, Ed.). Moskva: OOO Alpina Non-Fiction [in Russian].
Il’in, L. A. (1996). Realii i mify Chernobylya [Realities and myths of Chernobyl]. Moscow: ALARA Limited [in Russian].
Kanarskiy, E. V. (n.d.). Zona zhizni i smerti. Chernobyl… vzglyad s raznykh storon [The zone of life and death. Chernobyl... a view from different sides]. Kyiv: NUBiP [In Ukrainian].
Kemeny, J. (ed.). (1979). Report of The President’s Commission on the Accident at Three Mile Island: The Need for Change: The Legacy of TMI. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office [in English].
Kozlova, E. A. (2013). Nikolay Fedorovich Lukonin. Na sluzhbe u atoma [Nikolai Fedorovich Lukonin. Serving the atom]. Мoscow [in Russian].
Makhno, O. V. (2016). Osoblyvosti radianskoi derzhavnoi informatsiinoi polityky shchodo avarii na ChAES u pershi tyzhni pislia katastrofy [Features of the Ussr State Information Policy Around the Chernobyl NPP in the First Weeks after the Disaster]. History and Сontemporaneity of Kiev Polytechnic Institute: Selected Bibliography, (41), 149–158. Kyiv: IVC Vydavnytstvo “Politekhnika” [In Ukrainian].
Melikhova, E. M. (2017). Sotsialnye posledstviya tyazheloy avarii na AES Tri-Mayl-Aylend i osoboe vospriyatie radiatsionnogo riska [Social Сonsequences of the Severe Accident at the Three Mile Island NPP and a Special Perception of Radiation Risk]. Preprint IBRAE No. 2017-10, Moscow: IBRAE RAN [in Russian].
Mirnyi, S. (2010). Chornobyl yak info-travma [Chernobyl as an Information Trauma]. Krytyka, (3–4), 18–22 [in Ukrainian].
Molyako, V. A. (1992). Osobennosti proyavleniya paniki v usloviyakh ekologicheskogo bedstviya (na primere Chernobyl’skoy atomnoy katastrofy) [Features of Panic Manifestation in Ecological Disaster Conditions (the case of the Chernobyl nuclear catastrophe)]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 13(2), 66–73 [in Russian].
Plohiy, S. (2023). Chornobyl. Istoriia yadernoi katastrofy [Chernobyl: The History of a Nuclear Catastrophe]. (V. Makhonin & Ye. Tarnavskyi, Trans.). Kharkiv: Folio [in Ukrainian].
Plohiy, S. (2024). Atomy i popil: globalna istoriia yadernykh katastrof [Atoms and Ashes: A Global History of Nuclear Disasters]. (N. Starovoyt, Trans.). Kyiv: Nash Format [in Ukrainian].
Prister, B. S. (2011). Problemy radiatsiinoho zakhystu naselennia na terytoriiakh, zabrudnenykh u naslidok avarii na Chornobylskii AES [Problems of Radiation Protection of the Population in Territories Contaminated due to the Chernobyl NPP Accident]. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii nauk Ukrainy, (4), 3–11 [in Ukrainian].
Rubin, D. (1987). How the News Media Reported on Three Mile Island and Chernobyl Get access Arrow. Journal of Communication, 37(3), 42–57 [in English].
Sarkisov, A. A. (2018). Obrashchenie k chitateliu [Address to the Reader]. In R. V. Arutiunian, Chernobyl — Fukushima: Putevye zametki likvidatora [Chernobyl — Fukushima: A liquidator’s travel notes] (pp. 4–6). Мoscow Institut problem bezopasnogo razvitiia atomnoi energetiki RAN [in Russian].
Semenov, A. N. (1995). K 10-letiiu katastrofy na Chernobylskoi AES [On the 10th Anniversary of the Chernobyl Disaster]. In A. N. Semenov (Ed.), Chernobyl. Desiat let spustia. Neizbezhnost ili sluchainost? [Chernobyl. Ten years later. Inevitability or Accident?] (pp. 7–74). Мoscow: Energoatomizdat [in Russian].
Sidorenko, V. A. (Ed.). (2002). Istoriia atomnoi energetiki Sovetskogo Soiuza i Rossii. Vyp. 4: Uroki avarii na Chernobylskoi AES [History of Nuclear Energy in the Soviet Union and Russia. Vol. 4: Lessons from the Chernobyl accident]. Мoscow [in Russian].
Sidorenko, V. A. (Ed.). (2010). Ob atomnoi energetike, atomnykh stantsiiakh, uchiteliakh, kollegakh i o sebe [About Nuclear Energy, Nuclear Power Plants, Teachers, Colleagues, and Myself]. (2nd ed.). Мoscow [in Russian].
Thornburgh, D. (1999). Some Reflections on Three Mile Island. The Clarke Center for the Interdisciplinary Study of Contemporary Issues Dickinson College [in English]. https://tmi.dickinson.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/309.pdf
Vishnevskaya, V. P. (2004). Psikhologiya obraza bolezni u uchastnikov likvidatsii posledstviy avarii na Chernobylskoy AES s psikhosomaticheskoy patologiyey [The Psychology of Disease Image in liquidators of the Chernobyl NPP Accident with Psychosomatic Pathology]. (Doctoral dissertation), St. Petersburg [in Russian]. https://www.dissercat.com/content/psikhologiya-obraza-bolezni-u-uchastnikov-likvidatsii-posledstvii-avarii-na-chernobylskoi-ae
Walker, J. (2004). Three Mile Island: A Nuclear Crisis in Historical Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press [in English].
Yusov, S. (2022). Chornobylska AES: prohramuvannia katastrofy [The Chernobyl NPP: Programming the catastrophe]. Ukrainske suspilstvo v 1960–1980-kh rr. Istorychni narysy, 684–706. Kyiv: IIU NANU [in Ukrainian]. http://resource.history.org.ua/item/0016950
Yusov, S. (2024). Film “Aktyvna zona” yak svidchennia negarazdiv z bezpekoiu na radianskykh AES [The film “Active Zone” as evidence of safety issues at Soviet nuclear power plants]. Education via Distance Learning and other Pedagogical Challenges: Proceedings of the 3rd International Scientific and Practical Internet Conference, September 9–10, 2024. International Electronic Scientific and Practical Journal “WayScience”. Dnipro: FOP Marenichenko V.V., 154–157 [In Ukrainian]. http://www.wayscience.com/en/3rd-conference-9-10-september-2024/
Yusov, S. (2024). Kinostrichka “Komisiia z rozsliduvannia” — yak vidobrazhennia avarii na Leningradskii AES ta poperedzhennia pro Chornobyl. Achievements of 21st Century Scientific Community: Proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific and Practical Internet Conference. FOP Marenichenko V. V. [in Ukrainian]. http://www.wayscience.com/en/2nd-conference-16-17-september-2024/
Yusov, S. L., & Bulhakova, O. V. (2017). Reaktsiia kyian na avariiu na Chornobylskii AES ta yii naslidky kriz pryzmu zvernen do vladnykh instantsii (pershyi misiats pislia avarii) [Kyiv residents reaction to the Chornobyl disaster and its consequences through the prism of appeals to the authorities (the first month after the accident)]. Ukraina XX st.: Kultura, ideolohiia, polityka: zb. st., 22, 342–358 [in Ukrainian].
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Святослав Юсов
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal retain the right of authorship of the work and give to the journal right of first publication of this work under the conditions of Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), which allows others freely distribute the work published with reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of this magazine.
