ANTHROPOCENTRICISM AND SOCIOCULTURAL APPROACH AS COMPONENTS OF CIVILIZATION UNDERSTANDING OF UKRAINIAN HISTORY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2524-0757.2020.2.10Keywords:
anthropocentrism, sociocultural approach, civilizational knowledge, humanities, history, UkraineAbstract
The methodological significance of the transition to civilizational knowledge of history is clarified in the article. The author notes that the methodological reorientation of historians and the transition to the study of the history of the Ukrainian people in the context of the civilization paradigm have contributed for raising the scientific level of historical studies. Due to this, a new vision of key problems of domestic and foreign history was formed and a number of falsified and distorted issues in the imperial and Soviet times were refuted. This made it possible to demonstrate the civilizational identity of Ukraine. Modern science considers the sociocultural approach as a methodological tool for the systematic study of the interaction of all spheres of society. Culture appears as an important criterion for the content and quality of social life. The civilizational model of the historical cognition overcomes the gaps of the Ukrainian history and promotes the establishment of Ukrainian identity. It prevents ignoring the traditional culture and mentality of the Ukrainian people, the deep regional features of the country. With the civilizational knowledge of Ukraine is related it civilizational choice, the European integration processes, which is based on a dialogue with Europe. In the civilization paradigm, the history of Ukraine is considered as the history of a separate country, but not in isolation, in relation to the history of other peoples, in the context of regional and world civilizations.
Downloads
References
Boichenko, I. V. & Romanenko, O. V. (Eds). (2003). Tsyvilizatsiia: struktura i dynamika. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Hai-Nyzhnyk, P. (Ed.). (2016). Proceedings of the All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Conference Kyiv: “MP Lesia” [in Ukrainian].
Halushko, K. Yu. (2003). Antropolohiia istorychna. In V. A. Smolii (Ed.), Entsyklopediia istorii Ukrainy (Vol. 1, p. 109). Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].
Horielov, M. Ye., Motsia, O. P., Rafalskyi, O. O. (2005). Tsyvilizatsiina istoriia Ukrainy. Kyiv: “EksOb” [in Ukrainian].
Horielov, Ye., Motsia, O. P., Rafalskyi, O. O. (2009). Derzhava i tsyvilizatsiia v istorii Ukrainy. Kyiv: Eko-Prodakshyn [in Ukrainian].
Holovko, B. (1997). Filosofska antropolohiia. Kyiv: IZMN, 240 p. [in Ukrainian].
Honcharevskyi, V. E. (2010). Tsyvilizatsiinyi pidkhid do istorii: suchasnyi ukrainskyi dosvid (1991–2009). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Hrushevskyi, M. (1991). Khto taki ukraintsi, i choho vony khochut. Kyiv: «Znannia Ukrainy» [in Ukrainian].
Huberskyi, L., Andrushchenko, V., Mykhalchenko, M. (2002). Kulturni vymiry rozvytku tsyvilizatsii na rubezhi stolit: problemy vyznachennia. Kyiv: «Znannia Ukrainy» [in Ukrainian].
Kalakura, Ya. S. (2014). Tsyvilizatsiinyi vybir Ukrainy: teoretyko-metodolohichnyi, istorychnyi ta osvitianskyi aspekty. Ukraina u svitovii istorii, 3(52), 224–242 [in Ukrainian].
Kalakura, Ya. S. (2014). Tsyvilizatsiini oriientyry novitnoi ukrainskoi istoriohrafii. Istoriohrafichni doslidzhennia v Ukraini, 24, 23–38 [in Ukrainian].
Kalakura, Ya. S., Rafalskyi, O. O., Yurii, M. F. (2017). Mentalnyi vymir ukrainskoi tsyvilizatsii. Kyiv.: Heneza [in Ukrainian].
Kalakura, Ya. S., Rafalskyi, O. O., Yurii, M. Ya. (2015). Ukrainska kultura: tsyvilizatsiinyi vymir. Kyiv.: IPiEND im. I. F. Kurasa NAN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
Kalakura, Ya. S., Yurii, M. F. (2016). Metodolohichni zasady tsyvilizatsiinoho piznannia kultury. Naukovi zapysky IPiEND, 3–4, 41–54 [in Ukrainian].
Kosmyna, V. H. (2011). Problemy metodolohii tsyvilizatsiinoho analizu istorychnoho protsesu. Zaporizhzhia : ZNU [in Ukrainian].
Makklelland, D. (2007). Motivatsiia cheloveka. Saint Petersburg: Piter [in Russian].
Marks, K. Svyatoie semeistvo, ili Kritika kriticheskoi kritiki. Protiv Bruno Bauera i kompanii. In K. Marks i F. Engels. Sochineniia (Vol. 2). Moskva: Politizdat [in Russian].
Melnyk, V. (2015). Narysy z teorii sotsiokulturnoi antropolohii. Vinnytsia [in Ukrainian].
Mikhalchenko, N. I., Andrushchenko, V. P. (2012). Ukraina raskolotaia v sebe: ot Leonidii do Viktorii. Vol. 2. Kyiv: ІPіEND іm. І. F. Kurasa [in Russian].
Mikhalchenko, N. (2016). Velikii tsivilizatsionnyi vzryv na rubezhe ХІХ–ХХ vekov. Kyiv [in Russian].
Mikhalchenko, N. (2013). Ukrainskaia regionalnaia tsivilizatsiia: proshloie, nastoiashchee, budushchee. Kyiv: IPiENI im. I. F. Kurasa NAN Ukrainy [in Russian].
Motsia, O. P. (2011). Ukraintsi: narod i yoho zemlia (etapy stanovlennia). Kyiv: Starodavnii Svit [in Ukrainian].
Mykhailiuk, O. (2016). Sotsiokulturnyi pidkhid yak metodolohiia istorychnoho doslidzhennia. Ukrainskyi selianyn, 16, 9–14 [in Ukrainian].
Rafalskyi, O., Samchuk, Z. (2018). Tsyvilizatsiine perekhrestia suchasnoho suspilstva. Kyiv: IPiENDim. I. F. Kurasa NAN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
Pavlenko, Yu. V. (2001). Istoriia svitu: tsyvilizatsiinyi i sotsiokulturnyi rozvytok liudstva. Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].
Salata, O. (2017). Svitohliadni ta metodolohichni pozytsii formatsiinoho i tsyvilizatsiinoho pidkhodiv do istorii. In O. O. Salata (Ed.), Tsyvilizatsiini dyskursy svitovoi ta ukrainskoi istoriohrafii : monohrafiia (pp. 9–20) [in Ukrainian].
Salata, O. O. (2016). Tsyvilizatsiinyi pidkhid u vykladanni istorii: vid naukovoi kontseptsii do shkilnoi audytorii. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetuimeni H. S. Skovorody: «Istoriia ta heohrafiia», 56, pp. 98–105 [in Ukrainian].
Schwartz, S. & Sagie, G. (2000). Value Consensus and Importance. A Cross National Study. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, Vol. 31, 4. http://jcc.sagepub.com/
Shakun, N. V. (2018). Sotsiokulturnyi pidkhid do istorii yak alternatyva istorychnomu monizmu. Problemy sotsialnoi roboty: filosofiia, psykholohiia, sotsiolohiia, 1 (11) [in Ukrainian].
Seheda, S. (2009). Antropolohiia. Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].
Smovzhenko, S. & Skryn, Z. E. (Eds.). (2015). Ukrainska liudyna v yevropeiskomu sviti: vymiry identychnosti. Kyiv: UBS NBU [in Ukrainian].
Sytnyk, S. (2012). Kulturna antropolohiia: pokhodzhennia liudyny i suspilstva. Lviv: «Lvivska politekhnika» [in Ukrainian].
Voropaieva, V. H. (2008). Antropolohichni zasady doslidzhennia liudyny yak tsilisnoi istoty: teoretyko-metodolohichnyi analiz. Humanitarnyi visnyk ZDIA, 33, 169–176 [in Ukrainian].
Voropaieva, T.S. (2018). Ukrainska liudyna yak «HOMO ANTEMURALE». Abstracts of Papers ‘18. Antropolohichni vymiry filosofskykh doslidzhen, (pp. 82–85), Dnipro [in Ukrainian].
Yurii, M. F. (2008). Antropolohiia. Kyiv: Dakor. [in Ukrainian].
Yurii, M. F. (2008). Sotsiokulturnyi svit Ukrainy. Kyiv: Kondor [in Ukrainian].
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Ярослав Калакура
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal retain the right of authorship of the work and give to the journal right of first publication of this work under the conditions of Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), which allows others freely distribute the work published with reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of this magazine.
