The Church Renewal Movement in Ukraine: Based on the Materials of the Kharkiv “Tserkovna Hazeta” (1906)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2524-0757.2024.19Keywords:
Orthodox Church, church renewal movement, Kharkiv “Tserkovna Hazeta”, liberal reforms, principles of Kyiv Christianity, imperial totalitarianismAbstract
The article describes the church renewal movement, the emergence of which Ukraine at the beginning of the 20th century was a fully natural phenomenon due to the formation of initial liberal processes in society generally caused by the revolution of 1905–1907. It is shown that, not being national-liberation movement, the renewal movement was ideologically based in many respects on the principles of the functioning of the old Orthodox Church in Ukraine (Kyiv Metropolis), which was absorbed by the Moscow Patriarchate in 1686. The move was, in particular, about the independence of the church from the state, canon law, freedom of religion. As evidenced by the materials of the “Tserkovna Hazeta” (“Church Newspaper”), Kharkiv renewalists advocated the need for intra-church reforms in close connection with reforms of a general social nature. Among them were the following: shortening the working day and improving the working conditions of workers, overcoming the lack of land owned by peasants, granting civil rights and freedoms to all categories of the population, banning the death penalty. Rejecting the course of complete separation of the state from the church, the renewalists professed their harmony, the goal of which was declared to be the formation of a “Christian public”, and the means of its creation was to be non-violent “Christian politics”. The short-term existence of the church renewal movement is interpreted first due to the narrow social base of renewal at that time, and second to be a proof of the imperial Russian state’s inadmissibility of any forms of ecclesiastical and generally social liberal ideology.
Downloads
References
Balakshina, Yu. V. (2014). Bratstvo revnitelei tserkovnogo obnovleniia (gruppa «32‑h» peterburgskikh sviashchennikov, 1903–1907). Dokumentalnaia istoriia i kulturnii kontekst. Moscow [in Russian].
Bondarenko, H. A. (2016). Vnesok universytetu v rozvytok tserkovnykh periodychnykh vydan Kharkivskoi yeparkhii druhoi polovyny ХІХ — pochatku ХХ st. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina. Seriia «Istoriia», 52, 7–15 [in Ukrainian].
Merezhkovskii, D. S. (1991). Griadushchii kham. Bolnaia Rossiia, pp. 13–45 [in Russian].
Mykhailyn, I. L. (2005). Kharkivska zhurnalistyka v period pershoi rosiiskoi revoliutsii. Naukovi zapysky Instytutu zhurnalistyky, 21 [in Ukrainian]. http://journlib.univ.kiev.ua/index.php?act=article&article=1623
Mikhailichenko, D. Yu. (2012). Professor protopresviter Ioann Filevskii (1865 — ne ranshe 1927): bogoslov, liberal, obnovlenets. Nauchnie vedomosti BelGU. Ser. Istoriia. Politologiia. Ekonomika. Informatika, Belgorod, 7 (126), 149–159 [in Russian].
Miroshnichenko, S. V. (2013). Dzhereloznavchi aspekty doslidzhennia periodychnoho druku Slobidsko-Ukrainskoi (Kharkivskoi) hubernii XIX — pochatku XX st. Hurzhiivski istorychni chytannia, 6, 78–81 [in Ukrainian].
Nadtoka, H. M. (1998). Pravoslavna tserkva v Ukraini 1900-1917 rokiv: sotsialno-relihiinyi aspekt. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Nadtoka, H. M. (1996). Pravoslavna tserkva i protses ukrainskoho natsionalnoho vidrodzhennia 1900–1917 rokiv. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Soloviev, V. S. (1990). Obshcheistoricheskoie vvedenie. O zakone istoricheskogo razvitiia. T. 2, Moscow [in Russian].
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Інна Горпинченко
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal retain the right of authorship of the work and give to the journal right of first publication of this work under the conditions of Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), which allows others freely distribute the work published with reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of this magazine.