ІНФОРМАЦІЙНЕ ПРОТИСТОЯННЯ МІЖ НІМЕЧЧИНОЮ ТА СРСР В ІСТОРІОГРАФІЇ

Oksana Salata

doi:10.28925/2524-0757.2018.1.5262

Authors

Oksana Salata Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of History of Ukraine, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2524-0757.2018.1.5262

Keywords:

World War II, information confrontation, Nazi Germany, Soviet Union, national historiography, foreign historiography

Abstract

The second world and its constituent German-Soviet wars became the key events of the 20th century. Currently, the study of domestic and foreign historiography in the context of the disclosure of the information policy of the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany, the information confrontation of the Nazi and Soviet systems of information and psychological influence on the enemy population is relevant. Thanks to the work of domestic and foreign scholars, the attraction of new archival materials and documents, the world saw scientific works devoted to various aspects of the propaganda activities of Nazi Germany, including in the temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine. Among them are the works of Ukrainian historians: A. Podolsky, Y. Nikolaytsya, P. Rekotov, O. Lysenko, V. Shaikan, M. Mikhailyuk, V. Grinevich; Russian historians M. I. Semiaryagi, E. Makarevich, V. I. Tsymbal and G. F. Voronenkova. An analysis of scientific literature published in Germany, England and the United States showed that the effectiveness and negative effects of German information policy are revealed in the works of German historians and publicists O. Hadamovsky, N. Muller, P. Longerich, R. Coel, et al. Along with the works devoted to armed confrontation, one can single out a study in which the authors try to show the information technologies and methods of psychological action that were used by the governments of both countries to influence the consciousness and the moral and psychological state of their own population and the enemy’s population, on the results of the Second World War. Most active in the study of Nazi propaganda and information policy of the Third Reich, in general, were the German historians, in particular E. Hadamovskie, G. Fjorsterch and G. Schnitter, and others. The value of their work is to highlight the process of the creation in 1933–1945 of the National Socialist Party in Germany of an unprecedented system of mass manipulation in the world’s history, fully controlled by the Nazi leadership of the information space. Thus, an analysis of the works of domestic and foreign scholars shows that the information confrontation between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union was extremely powerful, since both warring parties possessed the most up-to-date information and ideological weapon. Unfortunately, today there is no comprehensive study of this problem that could reveal all aspects of the information confrontation in the modern information world.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Armstrong, J. A. (Ed.) (1964). Soviet Partisans in World War II. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press,792 p. [in English].

Hadamowsky, E. (1933). Propaganda und nationale Macht. Die Organisation der oeff entlichen Meinung fuer die nationale Politik. Oldenburg, 128 p. [in German].

Jowett, G. S., & O’Donell, V. (1992). Propaganda and Persuasion. Stuttgart, 240 p. [in English].

Koehl, R. L. (1957). RKFDV: German Resettlement and Population Policy (1939–1945). Cambridge, 352 p. [in English].

Soeseman, B. (2002). Propaganda und Oeff entlichkeit in der “Volksgemeinschaft ”. In Nationalsozialismus und die deutsche Geschichte: Einfuerung und Ueberblick. Stuttgart-Muenchen: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 416 p. [in German].

Wipperman, W. (1989). Der konsequente Wahn. Ideologie und Politik Adolf Hitlers. Muenchen, 620 p. [in German].

Bezymenskii, L. A. (1981). Razgadannyie zagadki Tretiego Reikha, 1933–1941: Kniga ne tolko o proshlom. Moscow: «Novosti», 279 p. [in Russian].

Bezymenskii, L. A. (1981). Sekretnaia diplomatiia Vtoroi mirovoi voiny. Osobyi arkhiv. Moscow: «Veche», 441 p. [in Russian].

Bolianovskyi, A. (2000). Dyviziia «Halychyna». Istoriia. Lviv: Lvivskyi natsionalnyi universytet im. I. Franka, 528 p. [in Ukrainian].

Volkogonov, D. A. (1983). Psikhologicheskaia voina: Podryvnyie deistviia imperializma v oblasti obshchestvennogo soznaniia. Moscow: Voenizdat, 288 p. [in Russian].

Haidabura, V. M. (1998). Teatr, zakhovanyi v arkhivakh: Stsenichne mystetstvo v Ukraini periodu nimetsko-fashystskoi okupatsii (1941–1944). Kyiv: Mystetstvo, 224 p. [in Ukrainian].

Halchak, S. D. (2004). «Skhidni robitnyky» z Podillia u Tretiomu reikhu: Dokumenty, natsystska katorha, opir ponevoliuvachamn. Vinnytsia: Knyha-Veha, 343 p. [in Ukrainian].

Ginzburg, L. (1990). Potustoronniie vstrechi. Moscow: Novosti, 312 p. [in Russian].

Gorlov, A. S. (2009). Sovetskaia propaganda v gody Velikoi Otechestvennoi voiny: institutsionalnyiei organizatsionnyie aspekty. Candidate’s thesis, Kyiv, 270 p. [in Ukrainian].

Hrynevych, V. A. (2005). Stalinska natsionalna polityka shchodo natsionalnykh menshyn u roky Druhoi svitovoi viiny 1939–1945 rr. Abstracts of Papers ’05: Drugha svitova viina і dolia narodiv Ukrainy, Kyiv, pp. 182–187 [in Ukrainian].

Ivlev, I. A. (1988). Oruzhie kontrpropagandy, Sovetskaia propaganda sredi naseleniia okkupirovannoi territorii SSSR. Moscow: «Mysl», 287 p. [in Russian].

Kershou, Ya. (1997). Gitler. Rostov na Donu: Feniks, 320 p. [in Russian].

Koval, M. V. (Ed.) (1988). Obshchestvenno-politicheskaia zhizn trudiashhikhsia Ukrainy v gody Velikoi Otechestvennoi voiny. Kyiv: «Naukova Dumka» AN USSR, In-t istorii, 231 p. [in Ukrainian].

Lysenko, O. Ye. (2007). Sotsialni aspekty okupatsii Ukrainy: metodolohiia problemy. Storinky voiennoji istorii Ukrainy, (11), 3–9 [in Ukrainian].

Mazuritskii, A. M. (1995). Ocherki istorii bibliotechnogo dela perioda Velikoi Otechestvennoi voiny (1941–1945 gg). Moscow: [b.i.], 26 p. [in Russian].

Mykhailiuk, M. (2006). Natsystska propahanda v okupovanomu Kyievi. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal, (1), 131–144 [in Ukrainian].

Miuller, N. (1974). Vermakht і okkupatsiia (1941–1944). Per. s nem. (A. Artemova, A. Dolgorukova, I. Karabutenko, Yu. Chuprova, G. Shevchenko, Trans.). Moscow: «Voenizdat», 387 p. [in Russian].

Nikolaiets, Yu. A. (1999). Stanovyshche ta nastroi naselennia Ukrainy na pochatku nimetsko-fashystskoi okupatsii: [cherven 1941–lypen 1942 rr.]. Vinnytsia: Tezys, 64 p. [in Ukrainian].

Orlov, Yu. Ya. (1985). Krakh nemetsko-fashistskoi propagandy v period voiny protiv SSSR. Moscow, 176 p. [in Russian].

Skorobahatov, A. V. (2004). Kharkiv u chasy nimetskoi okupatsii (1941–1943). Kharkiv: «Prapor», 367 p. [in Ukrainian].

Tytarenko, D. M. (2005). Zvity batalionu propaghandy U yak dzherelo z pytannia pro vplyv natsystskoi propahandy na naselennia okupovanoi Ukrainy. Abstracts of Papers ’05: Druha svitova viina і dolia narodiv Ukrainy, Kyiv, pp. 165–171 [in Ukrainian].

Tytarenko, D. M. (2010). «Nimetska propahanda v Ukraini musyt zdiшsnшuvatysia»: tsili natsystskoi propahandy v Ukraini u svitli nimetskykh dokumentiv. Hileia, (36), 478–484 [in Ukrainian].

Fersterch, G., Gelmert, G., Otto, G. $ Shnitter, G. (1966). Prussko-germanskii generalnyi shtab 1640–1965. K yego politicheskoi roli v istorii. Per. s nem. (Rudoi G., Trans.). Moscow: «Mysl», 572 p. [in Russian].

Chernaia, L. B. (1992). Korichnevyie diktatory: Gitler, Gering, Gimler, Gebbels, Borman, Ribbentrop. Moscow: «Respublika», 384 p. [in Russian].

Shaikan, V. O. (2005). Kolaboratsionizm na terytorii reiskomisariatu «Ukraina» і viiskovoi zony v roky Druhoi svitovoi viiny. Kryvyi Rih: Mineral, 451 p. [in Ukrainian].

Shaikan, V. O. (2005). Politychni nastroi intelihentsii Ukrainy radianskoho tylu v roky Velykoi Vitchyznianoi viiny і problem kolaboratsii, Visnyk Zaporizkoho yurydychnoho instytutu MVS Ukrajiny, (3), 231–236 [in Ukrainian].