Between the Text and Stone: Crimean Tatar Necropolises and Mortuary Practices in Travelogues of the 19th Century

Authors

  • Аnna Hedo Doctor of History, Professor, Head of the Department of History of Ukraine, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University, Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4151-0747
  • Oleh Ivaniuk PhD in History, Associate Professor at the Department of History of Ukraine, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University, Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6750-5423

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2524-0757.2025.210

Keywords:

Crimean Tatars, necropolis, mortuary practices, travel writing, funerary rites, Islam

Abstract

This article aims to explore how Crimean Tatar mortuary practices and necropolises were represented and interpreted in the 19th century through the lens of travelers’ accounts. The study employs an interdisciplinary methodology, drawing on cultural anthropology, memory studies (particularly Pierre Nora’s concept of lieux de mémoire), and postcolonial theory to critically analyse these sources. The article’s scholarly novelty lies in its systematic analysis of 19th-century travel narratives that describe Crimean Tatar burial customs and sacred spaces. This approach makes it possible to reconstruct how these practices were perceived by observers shaped by colonial ideologies, while also uncovering their significance in maintaining Crimean Tatar cultural identity. The analysis reveals that these travel accounts commonly include general reflections on death, detailed descriptions of funerary and commemorative rituals, and portrayals of Tatar necropolises — especially the royal tombs in Bakhchysarai. Many authors attempt to grasp the deeper meanings of these practices and the attitudes toward death they reflect. Travelers often describe Tatar mortuary traditions as unique compared to those of other peoples on the Crimean Peninsula. Despite colonial pressures, these practices remained remarkably stable, serving as symbolic expressions of cultural resilience and resistance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Billig, М. (1995). Banal Nationalism. SAGE Publications London — Thousand Oaks — New Delhi [in English].

Efimov, A. V. (1993). Opyt rekonstruktsii pogrebalnogo obriada krymskikh tatar (po materialam polevikh etnograficheskikh issledovanii). Materiali po arkheologii, istorii i etnografii Tavrii: Sb. nauchn. tr., III, pp. 198–201 [іn Russian].

Koliastruk, O. A. (2008). Dokumenty osobovoho pokhodzhennia yak dzherela z istorii povsiakdennosti. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal, 2, 145–153 [іn Ukrainian].

Nalyvaiko, D. (1998). Ochyma Zakhodu. Retseptsiia Ukrainy v Zakhidnii Yevropi ХІ-ХVІІІ st. Kyiv [іn Ukrainian].

Nora, P. (1989). “Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire”. Representations. Spring. 26: Special Issue: Memory and CounterMemory, 7–24 [in English].

Downloads


Abstract views: 2

Published

2025-12-16

How to Cite

Hedo А., & Ivaniuk, O. (2025). Between the Text and Stone: Crimean Tatar Necropolises and Mortuary Practices in Travelogues of the 19th Century. Kyiv Historical Studies, (2 (21). https://doi.org/10.28925/2524-0757.2025.210

Issue

Section

Socio-Cultural Studies

Most read articles by the same author(s)